Crafting a Discussion Rubric
Overview
Many instructors use this discussion rubric because its broad criteria can be applied across disciplines.
Why Use This?
This rubric is used in many course discussions because it includes criteria for content/relevance of the content, evidence of critical thinking/synthesis, and how well the learning contributes to the learning community.
This discussion rubric can be repurposed in many courses and content areas.
Image of a rubric with the following categories and criteria:
- Content/Relevance
- 5 points-Mastered: Content is complete, accurate and offeres new ideas. The discussion is well supported with details that explain the participant’s conclusions. Content encourages further discussion of the topic.
- 4 Points-Developed: Content is complete and accurate but lacking in new ideas. Content generally doesn’t invite further investigation or discussion.
- 3 Points-Underdeveloped: Ideas are incomplete or have inaccuracies, are presented without supporting facts or are inaccurate.
- Critical Thinking/Synthesis
- 5 points-Mastered: Clear evidence of critical thinking (application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation). Posts are characterized by originality and relevance to the topic.
- 4 Points-Developed: Some critical thinking evident, but posts may not directly address the topic.
- 3 Points-Underdeveloped: Lacking critical thinking. Posts tend to address peripheral issues or be inaccurate or unclear.
- Contribution to the Learning Community
- 5 points-Mastered: Frequently attempts to motivate and direct the group discussion; presents creative approaches to the topic.
- 4 Points-Developed: Presents relevant viewpoints for consideration by group; interacts freely.
- 3 Points-Underdeveloped: Makes no or only occasional, meaningful reflection on groups efforts; posts reflect marginal to no effort to become involved with the group.
- References and Connections
- 5 points-Mastered: Uses references to journals, readings, or personal experience to support comments.
- 4 Points-Developed: Incorporates some references from literature and personal experience.
- 3 Points-Underdeveloped: Uses some or no personal experience and no references to readings or research
- Total Points:20